Monday 15 January 2018

MOTIVATION AS A STRATEGY FOR ACHIEVING HIGHER PERFORMANCE IN AN ORGANIZATION (A Case Study of Kaduna Refinery & Petrochemical Company, Kaduna)

CHAPTER ONE
1.0     INTRODUCTION
1.1     BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
The nature and quality of life of most employees, especially textile workers (since my case study is KRPC) are very low and they low and they are exposed to a lot of industrial and health hazards, noises from the machines and equipments they use also affects them. Hence, industrials unrest is inevitable.

The topic “motivation as a tool for higher productivity in organization” can best be talked about when motivation is viewed from the angle of the employees (i.e workers) because it is the employees that make-up the organization.

In other words, when employees are well motivated and are doing well, they will be in the right frame of mind even at work place and thus, pass that well-being of theirs into whatever they are doing and in return make the organization productive since the well-being of the organization is a channel to their own (employees) well being.

The problem of motivating workers by the management is synonymous to all organizations of which KRPC is no exception, the view of management of organizations are that their workers are well motivated based on their overall net-profit margin, while on the other hand, the employees claim that management have not motivated them enough.

Human beings tend to have one need or the other at any point in time in the existence of such human. Individuals are concerned as striving to satisfy these needs within a world of limited and unavailable resources. To satisfy these needs certain behaviour must be undertaken that will lead to the desired goals. Virtually all such goals are located in the external world. Thus, the individuals constitute the workforce of an organization, it follows that for any organization to function efficiently and effectively, and achieve its desired aims and objectives and its survival in the market, it must try to boost the morale of its employees by motivating them to bring about job satisfaction and increased productivity. In other to make a positive approach to motivation, a brief explanation of terms such as motive, needs and reward will be made.

According Singhry, (2006) A motive is a desire that spurs a person to act in a certain manner. Motives are needs or desires that spring from within which causes outward manifestations, actions or behaviour in an employee. Motive supplies the energy or driving force, which cause people to act in a certain manner. Motives are external forces.
A need is condition that requires being satisfied. It is a manifestation from one’s lack of something, which can be satisfied by the attainment of that thing. Human needs varies from basic needs to the desires to be accepted by other or the wish for personal growth and development etc.

Human needs are insatiable; because once a need is met another need arises.
Lastly, reward includes financial reward and other benefits that make one to behave as expected of him/her. Rewards are inducements, which work out the individual externally and cause him/her to complete an action. Therefore, the importance of reward cannot be over-emphasized.

Hassan, (1999), motivation can be described as all those inner striving conditions described as wishes, desires, drives, etc. It is an inner state that activates or moves and directs behaviour towards the achievement of goals. These motivated acts could give positive or negative result depending on the application by the manager, and the structure of the organization whether big or small. It is obvious that no one can carry out efficiently organizations responsibilities especially in larger organizations, which have numerous departments e.g (KRPC), where a lot of machines and equipment including human efforts are highly needed. This human effort will be deficient if not properly energized to carry out their tasks satisfactorily.
Dechermer, (2008) Motivation can be defined as that management behaviour, action or incentive which enables the worker to willingly see, accept responsibility and carry out his task satisfactorily. There are various ways organizations try to motivate their employees. This may be positive or negative. Positive in the sense of salary increment, bonuses, promotion, training and free medical facility for staff etc while negative could be in form of such primitive measures as verbal threat, fear of loss of job, demotion etc.

However, effect of the apparent vagarious of human motivation Cole, (2002) reflected on one hand by circumstances such as low productivity, strikes, personal conflicts between supervisors and subordinates, clash of interest of subordinates (i.e where the subordinate use official time for personal purposes), restriction of output, absenteeism and high labour turn-over, and on the other hand, circumstances such as individual creativity, outstanding organizational achievement, high team spirit (Esprit –De-corps) and strong personal commitment of employees to their organizations, which is the aim of new Human Resources Management
Therefore, the behaviour of employees be it good, bad or indifferent, must be viewed in parts as the consequence of the motivation of employees in question. In discussing motivation as related to work, it should be noted that there are no clear cut guidelines or practices for motivating people because motivation is complex and highly individual.

1.2     STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEMS
Problems differ from one organization to another, depending on so many factors, some of which are how to survive in a competitive environment, technological advancement, financial resources, working environment, intends to investigate is how far has KRPC Kaduna as an organisation motivated its employees in a competitive environment that are operating, and the social economic situation of the state and the country at large. Also, how employees view their organizations in terms of how they are motivated.
The socio-economic life of employees differ a great deal because of the dynamic nature of the economy and so different types of motivation are to be used for each of different classes of workers. To speak about the general problem in the state and country as a whole, there is low capacity and resource utilization of most organizations, the globalizes economy, low infrastructure facilities political instability, change of government and policies etc. which has adversely affected some organizations in the state and country as a whole.

The KRPC is not an exception to the above mentioned problem. How far has KRPC motivated their workforce so that their organizational aims and objectives can be achieved to increase profit and continue to survive? The researcher is primarily concerned with how far has KRPC gone in motivating its different categories of workers so as to achieve higher productivity in the organization. The type of motivational tools used by the management and the overall effect on employees performance as well as on the organization.
 
1.3     OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The aim of this research work is to know how motivation of employees can lead to higher productivity in organization. The research work will take into consideration the various kinds of motivational tools used by management on a broader aspect. The aims and objectives of the study is to know:
a.       The effect of motivation on employee performance.
b.       The motivation of employees led to higher productivity.
c.       The various motivation tools used by management.
d.       The role of management in determining the best method of motivation.
e.       The role of union in ensuring that employees are properly motivated.
1.4     STATEMENT OF HYPOTHESIS
          This is research work is based on the following hypothesis.
          Ho:    Motivational tools such as monetary rewards, promotion, training
do not have direct effect on organizational productivity.
          Hi:     Motivational tools such as monetary rewards, promotion, training
have a direct effect on organizational productivity.

1.5     SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY 
The study would be beneficial to the following categories of persons:
Management: This study would enable the management to appreciate the need of motivating employees through performance, training, incentives etc.
Employees: Employees would be enlighten on the importance of motivation to their performance thereby insisting on this from their employers
Supervisors: supervisors of the employees would also be enlightened through this study to appreciate their subordinate verbally or recommending them to management for promotion.
Future researcher: This project will serve as a guide and source of information for further research on this subject matter or other related topics




1.6     THE SCOPE OF THE STUDY
This study was specifically focused on motivation as a strategy for achieving higher performance in an organization. This work is limited to only KRPC Kaduna, the study will cover the effect of motivation on employee performance, how motivation of employees led to higher productivity, the various motivation tools used by management, the role of management in determining the best method of motivation and the role of union in ensuring that employees are properly motivated.

1.7     LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
The province of the constraints faced by the researcher is the unwillingness of the officers to release certain information of reference to the researcher, and the difficulty in seeing the training officer who is in charge of all project work like mine.

On the part of the researcher, there is the problem of limited time for the research work and financial problems too. Also, the stress involved in conducting a research and combining lectures, assignments and tests.

1.8     HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE CASE STUDY
          The decision to construct the refinery in Kaduna was taken along side with that of Warri (the second refinery) as far back as 1974. However, the painful experience of fuel shortage in the year back prompted the decision of the federal government to construct a refinery in Kaduna and work was to begin immediately on it as early 1975. The contract which was awarded to chiyoda chemical engineering and construction company limited of Yokohamai Japan was mechanically completed as scheduled in accordance with the contractual by 15th April 1980 and was officially commissioned by the then president of the Federal Republic of Nigerian Alhaji Shehu Shagari on the 25th October 1980. The refinery which was initially planned to be a simple hydro skimming refinery was developed into an integrated refinery for the production of a variety of petroleum products. one major consequence of these developments is that lubricating oil would be one set of product of the refinery.
         
The lubricating oil complex of Kaduna refinery is the first of it kinds in West African and ranks as one of the biggest in Africa. The products of the Kaduna refinery are fuel like LFG, Petrol gas oil complex like Asphart, Wax and surplus which today are imported into the country.

1.9     DEFINITION OF TERMS
Unskilled Workers:       This comprises of those workers with little or no education, who use physical energy in carrying out their work. It is the physical effort of man directed to labour. They do not have any formal or special training on the job e,g labourers, drivers etc.

Semi-skilled workers:    This type of labour involves the combination of both physical and mental effort in carrying out productive activities. They have little training on the job e,g clerks, messengers etc.

Skilled workers:            This involves the use of mental efforts only in carrying on their respective responsibilities. They are experts on a field or profession. They acquire their skills either through educational background, training or experience.

Productivity:                 The major ability to grow things or the calculated rate of making goods. The ability to achieve the desired goals. It is the balance between all factors of production that will give the greatest output for the smallest effort.

Strikes:                          This is the cessation or stoppage of work or production activities in an organization by the workforce.